Court Denies VA’s Request to Stay Pending Cases
I told you this Halloween was getting pretty spooky. I also talked about how VA’s Office of General Counsel was running out of money, and that we were told to expect stays in many cases. As always, the VA keeps it slicker than a fox. Thankfully, the Court isn’t buying any of it. At least, for now.
The Motion
On October 20, 2025, the Secretary, acting through his Office of General Counsel filed an ex parte Motion with the Court, seeking to “stay of proceedings in all cases before the Court in which a Department of Veterans Affairs (Department or VA) filing deadline is pending, or where VA is permitted to file a pleading, beginning on Wednesday, October 29, 2025, through such time as the requisite funding for the Office of General Counsel (OGC) is appropriated, and excepting from this motion only those cases in which the Court has specifically ordered proceedings to continue despite a lapse in funding. The Secretary also respectfully moves this Court to suspend Rules 5(d), 25, 27(a)(5), 35(d), 36, and 41(b)(3).”
For those that don’t know, an ex parte Motion is filed without the other party being present. In other words, it is done without the effected side’s ability to respond, or say why what the person filing the Motion should not get the relief they are seeking.
The Court’s Response
The Court, apparently sitting en bacn (meaning all active Judges of the Court agreed in this decision) denied the Secretary’s Motion in whole.
“The Court has determined that its judicial review of veterans benefits cases is an excepted function that continues notwithstanding a lapse in appropriations. It is noteworthy that VA has determined that appellate review of veterans benefits cases is an excepted function and directed the Board of Veterans' Appeals to continue to make decisions on veterans' cases during the lapse in appropriations. Pausing VA's deadlines in nearly every case before the Court is a significant and extreme request, and the Secretary has failed to demonstrate that such sweeping relief is appropriate at this time. Therefore, the Court will deny the Secretary's motion, and all cases will continue to be processed in accordance with the Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure, including all requirements and filing deadlines,” (emphasis added).
Not much else to say about that. A Motion filed in the dead of night with no opportunity for Veterans to respond and object. Motion denied.
Spooky Halloween season.
Godspeed.